5.6x50 Magnum
Re: 5.6x50 Magnum
Trev i had one years ago in a Krico 600 HB. Foolishly sold it. Then years later i did one for BR as i did with 222 then 222 Rem Mag before it. Recently i acquired a few 223 Howa/Weatherby actions through a mate who owns three gun stores, two in Qld and O'Reilly's in Vic.
Then another mate and i did a horse trade and i ended up with dies and 300 new RWS cases which in themselves are worth a lot of cash and are scarce. So the itch itched some more. Then i decided to see how accurate a build could be done using components not necessarily first pick. Howa action, TSE barrel and Choate stock. So far it looks good.
Then another mate and i did a horse trade and i ended up with dies and 300 new RWS cases which in themselves are worth a lot of cash and are scarce. So the itch itched some more. Then i decided to see how accurate a build could be done using components not necessarily first pick. Howa action, TSE barrel and Choate stock. So far it looks good.
- Camel
- Ultimate AusVarminter
- Posts: 12084
- Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 8:51 pm
- Favourite Cartridge: 20-222 6x47 rem, 250
- Location: Northern Riverina NSW
Re: 5.6x50 Magnum
Well it has certainly turned out to be a half decent back scratcher.
- MISSED
- Moderator
- Posts: 8377
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:23 pm
- Favourite Cartridge: 20 PPC
- Location: YASS
Re: 5.6x50 Magnum
Yes it definitely works
I am a bit surprised at the velocity though I thought you would be getting a bit more
I shot with a bloke the other evening who was using 40’s in a 223 AI at 4000 fps he was using an old Sako A1 action I forget what load he was using but I will ask him and report back here
I am a bit surprised at the velocity though I thought you would be getting a bit more
I shot with a bloke the other evening who was using 40’s in a 223 AI at 4000 fps he was using an old Sako A1 action I forget what load he was using but I will ask him and report back here
- trevort
- Spud Gun
- Posts: 12710
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:21 pm
- Favourite Cartridge: Tater
- Location: Melbourne
Re: 5.6x50 Magnum
I got to 4440fps with the 40 gun nbt and still had room for more powder room n the 22x 47lap. Somehow I don’t think he picked this cartridge to win a speed competition
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- MISSED
- Moderator
- Posts: 8377
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:23 pm
- Favourite Cartridge: 20 PPC
- Location: YASS
Re: 5.6x50 Magnum
Trevor I am surprised at the velocity because the op is using a case 3mm longer and in a stronger action.
And yes your 22x47L is faster, the same as a 220 Swift, 22Creedmore ,22 Cheetah or possibly a 22 falcon
And yes your 22x47L is faster, the same as a 220 Swift, 22Creedmore ,22 Cheetah or possibly a 22 falcon
- Camel
- Ultimate AusVarminter
- Posts: 12084
- Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 8:51 pm
- Favourite Cartridge: 20-222 6x47 rem, 250
- Location: Northern Riverina NSW
Re: 5.6x50 Magnum
Now just who would have thunk that a case with a larger capacity could be run at higher speeds.
Re: 5.6x50 Magnum
Hi guys. Stock Win 223 case capacity of H2O is 30.1 grains. The AI version holds 32.2 grains of H2O.
The 5.6x60 case unfired holds 34.4 grains of H2O and another half grain once fired.
From those numbers the 5.6x50 should exceed the 223 AI case by an equal amount as it does over the standard 223 case. Why i didn't get a faster speed is more about component choice and restrictions due to primer blanking from a worn firing pin hole of a well used action. Why i chose BM2 is simply because of accuracy. If i wanted speed, CFE223 or 10X would be my first choice. But again useless until the firing pin issue is resolved.
Data shows where the 223 AI finishes at around 29 grains for 100% load density, those are recommended minimum in the 5.6x50.
The 5.6x60 case unfired holds 34.4 grains of H2O and another half grain once fired.
From those numbers the 5.6x50 should exceed the 223 AI case by an equal amount as it does over the standard 223 case. Why i didn't get a faster speed is more about component choice and restrictions due to primer blanking from a worn firing pin hole of a well used action. Why i chose BM2 is simply because of accuracy. If i wanted speed, CFE223 or 10X would be my first choice. But again useless until the firing pin issue is resolved.
Data shows where the 223 AI finishes at around 29 grains for 100% load density, those are recommended minimum in the 5.6x50.
- trevort
- Spud Gun
- Posts: 12710
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:21 pm
- Favourite Cartridge: Tater
- Location: Melbourne
Re: 5.6x50 Magnum
Try reading the last sentence you stupid old sheep herder. Like we know dumbassCamel wrote:Now just who would have thunk that a case with a larger capacity could be run at higher speeds.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- trevort
- Spud Gun
- Posts: 12710
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:21 pm
- Favourite Cartridge: Tater
- Location: Melbourne
Re: 5.6x50 Magnum
No Glenn. I made it for 55s but let’s not derail this threadGlenn wrote:Have you tried 50gr projectiles Trevor?
Glenn
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: 5.6x50 Magnum
Another session at the range this morning had me testing seating depth and primers to illiminate the popped shots i am continually seeing with the load testing. I opted to not use the RWS 4033 primer because their Chernobyl like brissance is to be saved for my long range rifles.
Seating depth of more jump and jam shows the contrast but did nothing to solve the separation of shots. Federal 205 Ms are very ordinary but the Rem 7 1/2s are a drastic improvement.
Being a hotter primer obviously settled the ignition issues like the 4033s did but in a far cheaper and more readily available way.
The final load looks to be 30 grains of BM2, Rem 7 1/2 and the 40 BT jumped around 10 thou.
At a later stage i will look to test CFE223 to try and pick up a couple of hundred fps, but for now this load around 3900 fps will get some use culling crows next weekend.
Seating depth of more jump and jam shows the contrast but did nothing to solve the separation of shots. Federal 205 Ms are very ordinary but the Rem 7 1/2s are a drastic improvement.
Being a hotter primer obviously settled the ignition issues like the 4033s did but in a far cheaper and more readily available way.
The final load looks to be 30 grains of BM2, Rem 7 1/2 and the 40 BT jumped around 10 thou.
At a later stage i will look to test CFE223 to try and pick up a couple of hundred fps, but for now this load around 3900 fps will get some use culling crows next weekend.
- Camel
- Ultimate AusVarminter
- Posts: 12084
- Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 8:51 pm
- Favourite Cartridge: 20-222 6x47 rem, 250
- Location: Northern Riverina NSW
Re: 5.6x50 Magnum
Crows will be in strife mate.
- trevort
- Spud Gun
- Posts: 12710
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 9:21 pm
- Favourite Cartridge: Tater
- Location: Melbourne
Re: 5.6x50 Magnum
It’s certainly working
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Tackleberry
- .270 Winchester
- Posts: 1369
- Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 4:56 am
- Favourite Cartridge: 17HMR
- Location: estern vic
Re: 5.6x50 Magnum
I likey